Oliver Millar,
The quarrelsome republican poet and polemicist George Wither (or Withers) — who may be destined to live in literary annals chiefly on account of Aubrey's perhaps apocryphal tale of his life being spared by Sir John Denham during the Civil War so that he (Denham) could not be accounted the worst living poet in England — has left relatively few literary manuscripts. This would not be surprising but for the extent of Wither's prolific, and eventful, literary activity over a period of well over half a century and in view of the ample evidence that much of what he wrote remained unpublished (itself not surprising considering his perpetual state of war with publishers and stationers). He himself published a list of his to satisfie the requests of his Friends
, at the end of his not Printed
or lost in Manuscript
— when his house was plundred, or by other casualties
— are various works in verse, such as lost
works, Wither gives the impression of a writer in a state of constant activity, who was wont to have various works in progress at the same time, some of which might remain unfinished for years. As he declared in the eleventh poem in
His unfinished
works would remain in what (in his preface to blurred papers
before being made legible to others
.
The solitary known surviving example of such blurred papers
— a rare example of an autograph working draft by any seventeenth-century poet and particularly interesting in view of the circumstances of its preservation — is the extensive autograph draft of his unfinished poem imperfect Poem
, lacking his last thoughts thereon
, was designed for private view / Of Clarendon
, and dedicated to him, did not spare it from seizure or Wither from committal (for three years) to an ignominious Jail
because of it.
Examples of Wither's fair copies, made legible to others
, are only marginally more plentiful. The author's own manuscript of a version of
It may be added that identification of the poet's handwriting has traditionally been regarded as difficult, and even such Wither scholars as J. Milton French have hesitated to pronounce conclusively on the main manuscripts, or to distinguish properly between the hands of scribes and of the author himself. This confusion has arisen partly because of the equally traditional assumption that clear examples of Wither's hand are extremely rare. Even granted the possible source of confusion caused by signatures by other namesakes, examples of the poet's handwriting survive in sufficient numbers to provide an adequate basis for identification of his hand, at least from the 1630s onwards. Even over a period of some decades, Wither's hand, with his characteristic letter-forms, remains distinctive, sufficiently so — under close scrutiny — for its sporadic appearance to be detected quite clearly in a manuscript such as
What is a clearly authoritative text of a commendatory poem by Wither on Christopher Brooke is copied by Brooke himself in one of his own manuscripts prepared, towards the end of his life, for the licensers of the press but not published until the nineteenth century (some imperfecter Coppies might hereafter be scattered abroad in writing
.
One or two other manuscript items that have been attributed to Wither are much more doubtful. For instance, the book catalogue of Joseph Lilly in 1861 included (p. 82) what was alleged to be the original manuscript
of most probably in the autograph of Wither himself
. It is quite likely that this was one of the contemporary transcripts of this poetical tract which are known to have circulated and are recorded below (
Yet another almost certainly spurious item offered in the same catalogue (p. 83) is a legal notebook supposedly identified as Wither's by the collector James Brook Pulham. It is described as Wither's Manuscript Note Book, 1650-60, a small 8vo. volume, written in a remarkably neat hand, so lettered by direction of Mr. Pulham, and believed by him, after an inspection and comparison of several of Wither's Manuscripts in the British Museum, to be in the autograph of the Poet, who was brought up to the law and had chambers in Lincoln's Inn. It contains memoranda of law cases
. The mention here of several of Wither's Manuscripts in the British Museum
alone would perhaps be sufficient to undermine Pulham's alleged identification
; but it might also be noted that one of the poet's namesakes in this period was indeed a lawyer: the George Wither who was a member of Gray's Inn in 1640, who was called to the Bar in 1650, and who became Recorder of Romsey in 1658.
Elsewhere, a few presentation exempla of certain of Wither's books are recorded, chiefly inscribed by Wither himself (
In signature
of Wither — possibly on detached slips and not certainly autograph — in an exemplum of a slip of paper on which is written in a very old hand,
.George Wither
, following which is the
Equally uncertain are alleged MS. corrections in the Poet's autograph
in exempla of
Examples of Wither's handwriting are increased by the survival of three original letters by him and a considerable number of official or legal documents signed by him. His three known autograph letters, dating from 1645 to 1661, are given entries below (
Other documents written or signed by Wither — assuming those documents whose whereabouts is not currently known were correctly identified in earlier times — can best be categorized in two groups. One, given entries below, is of miscellaneous and legal documents, including petitions by him and one by a scribe (
The other category of documents signed by Wither — which is indeed the most extensive source of examples of his signature — relates to his activities after the Civil War when he was a member of the Committee of Trustees for the Sale of the Late King's Goods. The most historically significant of these documents are four inventories, prepared in or after 1649 (
A number of other documents that have been recorded as being signed by George Wither the poet would appear to have been signed instead by one or other of his contemporary namesakes, some of them associated with his native county of Hampshire. These would include George Wither of Hall, in the parish of Dean, who signed an indenture of 28 July 1664, and his nephew George Wither of Winchester, whose will is in the
(i) A deed of acquitance from Richard Trewe of Church Oakley, to William Trewe of Worthing, Hampshire, signed by George Wither
as a witness, 8 June 1613 (Letter of Attorney, 1 page folio
signed by Wither as witness…June 8, 1613
, sold at Puttick & Simpson's, 28 February 1851, lot 215.
(ii) A deed of enfeoffment from John May Sr to John May Jr of the Manor of Worting, Hampshire, signed by George Wither
as a witness, 23 December 1646 (21
December 1646 sold at Puttick & Simpson's, 14 May 1849, lot 564; at Sotheby's, 21 March 1892, lot 351; at Samuel J. Davey's sale catalogue (1899), item 295; at Sotheby's, 24 July 1905, lot 191; and in Maggs's sale catalogues No. 317 (1913), item 3728; No. 554 (1931), item 340; and No. 593 (1934), item 257.
(iii) A receipt signed by George Wither
as a witness, 5 May 1647. Sold at Puttick & Simpson's, 21 June 1850 (Richard Burton sale) lot 267, to Montagu.
(iv) An indenture signed by George Wither
as a witness, 17 December 1647. Sold at Sotheby's, 19 May 1906, lot 51, to Pearson.
To this list of signatures by other George Withers may be added:
(v) A folio manuscript of state tracts and papers, the first leaf bearing (amidst other scribbling, including Robert Daye
, Thomas Ward
and Westminster Church
) the inscription George Withers his booke Anno D
(
No collected edition of Wither's works has been published in recent times, although the Spenser Society, which flourished in Manchester from 1867 to 1894, went a considerable way towards producing one by reprinting the great majority of Wither's published works. Several works found in the most notable Wither manuscripts recorded above are, nevertheless, discoveries made in the twentieth century, while yet further pieces by Wither have been found on occasions in printed sources: see, for instance, William D. Templeman, new
poems found in manuscripts: notably
On the other hand a salutary caution about modern attributions to Wither of various works is offered in David Norbrook,
A few other poems that are uncertainly, or spuriously, ascribed to Wither in manuscripts are given entries below in the appropriate category (
Some recorded printed exempla of works by Wither have contemporary manuscript additions by readers, or else missing pages supplied in manuscript. They include exempla of:
(i)
(ii) London printed for ye Author 1665
, owned in 1702 by Thomas Hearne (
(iii) temporall oppressions
(
(iv)
(v) the prose
(Joseph Lilly's sale catalogue for 1861, p. 68).
In addition, a complete transcript of
Moreover a series of transcripts
of various works by Wither, all apparently copied from printed editions, were sold in the fourth portion of the Joseph Lilly sale at Sotheby's, on 27 January (and five following days) 1873, as lots 1994, 1995, 2009, and 2109 (to Salkeld), 2002 (to Henner), 2004-2006, 2008, 2105-2106, and 2108 (to Bumstead), and 2110 (to Kerney?). It seems evident that these transcripts were all made by the Wither enthusiast James Brook Pulham (d.1860), for the same sale contained Pulham's collections and transcripts of various memoranda and pedigrees of the Wither family (lots 2103, 2104, 2107), as well as probably lot 2010, all sold to Bumstead. Some of these items were previously ascribed to Pulham in Joseph Lilly's sale catalogue of 1861, which includes (pp. 67-84) a major
Exempla of various of Wither's works containing the copious manuscript notes of Thomas Park (1759-1834) were also sold in the Gutch sale at Sotheby's on 16 March (and eight following days) 1858. They comprised notably lots 2656 (to Thorpe), 2664 (to Dixon), 2667 (with autograph of
, to Boone), 2695 (to Elkins), 2701 (to Lilly), 2706 (to Boone), and 2708 (Edw. Hobard from Ferdinando Wither, Uncle to ye author, 1641
with MS. corrections in the Wither pedigree, by E. Hopkins, Esq. of Alresford, Hants, the descendant of the Poet
, to Boone).
Some notebooks of George Thorn-Drury, KC (1860-1931) containing information about other Wither items sold at auction in the nineteenth century were acquired by J. Milton French and discussed by him in
A particularly interesting set of proofs of John Matthew Gutch's edition of Wither's
A three-page autograph memorandum by Sir Samuel Egerton Brydges, Bt (1762-1837) for his intended Preface to Wither's
A letter by the poet's son, Robert Wither, to Anthony Wood, 4 November 1673, now in the
Several unpublished doctoral dissertations on Wither occasionally mentioned by commentators are: J. Milton French, A Troublesome Litigious Man