Elizabeth I,
Elizabeth I,
Queen Elizabeth I,
Elizabeth I,
Elizabeth I,
Queen Elizabeth I is one of the most celebrated monarchs in British history, her forty-five-year reign being one of the most eventful and remarkable periods in that history. The subject of innumerable studies and biographies, as well as novels, plays, films and operas, virtually every aspect of her character and personal and political life has been scrutinized, if not sometimes romanticized, ever since her death four centuries ago. For present purposes, we are concerned with only one of those aspects: her writings.
These fall into several categories, all dominated by texts in manuscript.
Perhaps the earliest of her literary
writings are the semi-calligraphic and beautifully bound manuscripts of translations that she produced as a young Princess for her brother, Edward VI (*
Interesting light on some of Elizabeth's translations is thrown by an anonymous contemporary memorandum, on a single quarto leaf, in a peece
of Sallust's in what yeere of her Raigne I knowe not
), otherwise apparently unrecorded, the anonymous writer claims that her translation of Boetius
was begun at Windsor on 10 October and finished on 5 November 1593; that she translated a peece of Horace de arte poetica about November 1598
; and that her translation of a treatise of curiosity written by Plutark
was begun on 3 November and finished on 9 November 1598. He notes that
A second category is Elizabeth's original verse. As with so many other contemporary poets who neither published nor made any attempt to gather their poems into formal collections in their own lifetime, the canon of Elizabeth's verse remains uncertain, the contemporary or subsequent attributions to her varying in reliability. At present some fifteen poems are consigned to her in Bradford and in the Chicago
A third and most prolific category is Elizabeth's speeches and orations, which date from the first year of her reign to within two years of her death, many of them of striking eloquence. Again, the question of authorship is complicated. This is partly because at least some of her speeches would have incorporated contributions by her close advisors, such as her principal secretary of state William Cecil, Lord Burghley; and partly because various speeches exist in different versions. One would perhaps be the official
version written up for publication after the event rather than the speech she actually delivered in Parliament. Other versions would be determined by the circumstances in which her speeches were copied by different scribes present at their delivery, certain of whom frankly admitted that they could not catch everything she said, and whose texts inevitably vary. The exact process of her speech-making is still not clear, and it has even been speculated that she delivered speeches purely from memory, and that they were only written up afterwards. What is certain, however, whatever their predominant modus operandi, is that Elizabeth took an active, if not always exclusive, part in their composition, as is witnessed by several speeches that exist partly or wholly in her own autograph drafts (*
Although there are other reports of statements she made in various conferences or conversations, as well as brief remarks by her in Parliament or statements of her views delivered on her behalf by the Speaker, Elizabeth's formal
speeches are here taken to be those printed in separates
or as incorporated in scribal copies of parliamentary journals, both during her reign and well into the seventeenth century. Her most popular speech, copies of which abound (Golden Speech
of 30 November 1601, on the abuses of monopolies, the penultimate speech she ever delivered. Curiously enough, what is today her most celebrated speech, her inspiring address to the forces at Tilbury on 9 August 1588 during the Spanish Armada crisis, was relatively little copied (
Besides a few essays attributed to Elizabeth in early copies (
Besides all this, the mound of surviving documentation relating to Elizabeth – her innumerable letters, documents (including execution warrants) signed by her, proclamations and other official papers – is immeasurable and certainly beyond our present purview. If all this material, now widely scattered in libraries, record offices, and private collections world-wide, is ever collected and edited for print publication, what would truly be Elizabeth's Collected Works
would probably be an edition running into upwards of a dozen volumes.
One document which is worth drawing attention to is the mock-charter presented to Lord Burghley during a courtly entertainment at Theobalds in 1591, addressed by the Queen too the disconsolate & retired spryte, the hermyte of Tybolles
. The vellum document is signed by the Lord Chancellor, Sir Christopher Hatton, and bears the Great Seal. It is quite possible that the Queen had a hand in the preparation of this light-hearted frolic, designed to dissuade her elderly Secretary of State from retiring, and it is more than likely that it was the Queen herself who presented it to Burghley during the entertainment. The document was recorded in the early eighteenth century by John Strype, but was then lost to sight until rediscovered in 1980 in a trunk of old deeds at Sotheby's. It was offered at Sotheby's on 15-16 December 1980, lot 200, with a facsimile in the sale catalogue, and is now at Yale, Elizabethan Club (Eliz Vault). A facsimile of it is in the British Library (RP 2859).
A comprehensive cataloguing of books and manuscripts presented to Elizabeth, or owned or inscribed by her, would also be considerable. Three examples of Elizabeth's Book Inscriptions
, found in Windsor Castle and in the Bodleian Library, are quoted and discussed in
For discussions of the Queen's variable handwriting over the years, and for facsimile examples of it, see, inter alia, H.R. Woudhuysen, Good George
: Unpublished Letters
Several boxes of working papers of the Chicago edition of